kami tenchi vs featherine
Get this, Lmaolmao suggests we should equalize realities of two settings while simultaneously beating his chest about well-ordering infinitely sized objects that can't even be ordered continuously to one another and spent two pages going on about how ordinal numbers can be used to count the physical length of an infinite object. Lol. Change members Create variation Info No Variations. 0. © 2021 GAMESPOT, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. To say I am wrong is to argue that one can use the Cardinality of all Countable Ordinal Numbers to describe a bigger Infinite Multiverse. I said the Cardinality that can only be a thing from Ordinal numbers cannot be used to describe things that are real. 0. Let me educate you. You are still implicating the same mistake again. There is just no mappable correlation between using Cardinal numbers of set theory to Multiverses. Because distance is a scalar quantity, you can't really use a Cardinal number from set theory arithmetic that people know doesn't deal with scalar quantity, but deals with the membership of ORDINAL NUMBERS, you know the thing that you cannot use to describe length and size? Furthermore, (in case you didn't know) you cannot use the Cardinality of Real Numbers to describe how big a Multiverse is either. Kami Tenchi is a transcendent entity that is as incomprehensible and boundless an existence to the Choushin (who are already transcendent in relation to dimensions, nonexistence, logic, and any scientific theories), as they are beyond the understanding of ordinary beings. aleph null is very much related to philosophical infinity,aleph null is literally the thing most people think of when they say infinity(even if they dont know its called aleph null).You do realise having a distance of "aleph null kilometers" is the same as having "infinite distance". D4 rules over 4-dimensional space, whereas D11 rules over 11-dimensional space, and so onwards. What a coincidence that you cannot use the Cardinality of all Countable Ordinal Numbers to describe kilometers and that the only time you get bigger infinite sets is with a type of Cardinal Number resulting of a theory that your real mathematician will literally tell you does not and cannot be used to describe the size of an object quantifiably. NO. Kami Tenchi is above three multiverse creators (who he possibly created? Aleph One is LITERALLY the Cardinality of all Countable Ordinal Numbers, that's the only reason why it's "bigger" it is only "bigger" in the sense that it has more variables and elements, nothing more that you can use to describe something real in terms of physical size and length. @noaleph: so you get aleph 1 of something is bigger than aleph null of something........? You cannot say Set C is bigger than Set E for instance if you take em out and add them just because its Cardinality is greater, but you are uneducated enough to think this makes sense to describe size. That isn't describing size of an object, but elements, you are falsely equalizing these two things. The fact that you don't know this makes this hilarious. She sometimes is bored of living for too long so she repeatedly lives and dies. Set E has "more" numbers or elements than set C.Again my infinitesimal mind seems to be able to relate "more' to size,but your omniscience seems to have overlooked this fact. Follow 185. You are literally trying to justify using a mathematical theory that has ZERO to do with describing the size of things, to measure the size and amount of space. Because it's not like the Author told us otherwise and this makes the most sense. I don't know fam. kek kek kek. At best, this argument can only be used to justify dimensional tiering but not the erroneous god awful "Transfinite Cardinal Tiering" which is far far far worse. You can change the spelling of one, two and three all you want, call it Aleph One, it is still finite. It describes a number of numbers and the variables within a set, nothing to do with size. Hell, a hypothetical continuous line equivalent to a Transfinite Ordinal number is not really longer than an Aleph-0 line, it just has more members per se and more complex. Multiverses are arranged in a way that is pretty much impossible to map them to Infinities that are bigger than another. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Kami Tenchi vs Featherine Augustus Aurora & Najimi Ajimu. Aleph One is not describing Space-Time, it is a Cardinality correlating to the variability on the membership within a set. The numbers between Aleph 0 and Aleph 1 are ordinal numbers. Literally anyone who knows a thing about Set Theory will tell you this. cardinals dont even have anything to do with ordinals and arrangement.Higher cardinal is literally having more of something. And countable infinity can very well be used to count physical quantities.Your mind will explode when you learn about units. VSbattles is currently like in the stone age in terms of understanding mathematical axioms and theories. Listen kid, example: if you use negative numbers to describe a size, no matter how many times you insist, you treat it like regular numbers, it is just regular numbers. You can change the spelling of one, two and three all you want, call it Aleph One, you treated it not as a Transfinite Cardinal Number but as something on the Number Line? there actually is,you just need to decide what you are mapping or representing the size of.Or whether you accept continuum hypothesis or not,but alephs dont matter anyway as You can just quantify using R,which is the cardinality of the set of real numbersso if a straight line has R number of points,a 2D space will have R^2(although it will be the same cardinality)a 3D space R^3 and so on, there actually is,you just need to decide what you are mapping or representing the size of.Or whether you accept continuum hypothesis or not,but alephs dont matter anyway as You can just quantify using R,which is the cardinality of the set of real numbers, so if a straight line has R number of points,a 2D space will have R^2(although it will be the same cardinality). But you cannot use things like Aleph One, Two and Three or such to describe a Multiverse bigger than infinity. © 2021 GAMESPOT, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. A Cardinality of Ordinal numbers cannot be used to get bigger physical objects of Spacetime. They have nothing to do with measuring how big an infinite chocolate chip cookie can be. there actually is,you just need to decide what you are mapping or representing the size of.Or whether you accept continuum hypothesis or not,but alephs dont matter anyway as You c Meanwhile aleph 1 is the cardinality of a set that has literally more stuff in it than a set with cardinality aleph null as in they cant be mapped to each other. You have zero arguments and you have ZERO understanding of the maths you are misusing. The cosmic hierarchy of the When They Cry series (including Umineko and Higurashi) is based on perspective. When we know Transfinite Ordinal numbers are just an extension of Aleph-0. Exactly. Prove it then.Prove aleph null is the same size as aleph 1. 0. Your points are just... awful and bad. She appears in the sixth, seventh, and eighth games; Dawn of the Golden Witch, Requiem of the Golden Witch, and Twilight of the Golden Witch, respectively. Because Set Theory doesn't really deal with size of an object either, but the membership of numbers. Kami Tenchi & Featherine Augustus Aurora vs Lucifer Morningstar & Darkseid. Golden Ninja vs Kami Tenchi. Comments. You even unironically and literally argued that length and addition can correlate to Transfinite ordinal numbers. Imagine thinking aleph 1 can be mapped to naturals, You won't get a line from aleph null points,there just aren't "enough" to generate a continuum, At least get something right for fucks sake. no,I am saying an aleph 1 amount of universes is>an aleph null amount of them,when the individual universes are of the same size. @noaleph: I wasnt talking about the size of the elements either,I only said having a set containing aleph 1 universes is bigger than having a set containing aleph null of them assuming individual universes are of the same size, @noaleph: I wasnt talking about the size of the elements either,I only said having a set containing aleph 1 universes is bigger than having a set containing aleph null of them. 0 wins (0%) 0 (0%) 2 wins (100%) Zeno Sama Zeno: power stats. Any attempt to describe an Uncountable Infinity of Universes is by default just fucking impossible by the rules of Set Theory and the definition of what an Infinitely Sized Universe is. @noaleph: stop saying cardinals dont deal with size.They do.deal with it. oh my fucking god dude aleph 1 literally has more stuff than aleph null.You are literally spouting bullshit at this point.Cardinality is literally the measure of "how much" there is in a set.Higher cardinality is literally having more stuff than the lower one. Superhero Class. That being said, it talks about her power when for a verse as powerful as Unimeko you have to destroy that shit only to make her defeatable, let alone actually beat her. @Bernkastelll Yeah, nothing indicates to me Outerversal except MAYBE, THE idea of having no restriction.But this also is expressed by Zeno, God Sigma, and many more fictional beings, it doesn't really indicate true tier-0 without other parameters being covered.From my understanding it's definitely better than Abraxas' explanation, but it's missing things for me. Infinite Dimensional Space is literally "Rℵ0". That being said though, she is hinted to be defeatable if you can destroy the shit he has in her forehead. Forum Posts. That's the wrong question. Speed. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Just because a concept exists in mathematics, this does not mean this applies to things like Multiverses. This is what happens when you let pseudo-intellectual brainlets like MyMom and Lmalmao who get PhD from VSbattlesWiki, also known as "I think Kratos is multiversal" wiki-cult, and think you know jackshit about mathematical theories way beyond your brain's intellectual capacity paygrade. Tenchi Genmyo, Shinbe Hen Tsurikiji: Manji Mandala— Muryou Taisuu! Omnipotent vs Omnipotent is a draw. Several Reddit and Spacebattles users already proved that both Uncountable Infinity Tiering and Dimensional Tiering are invalid for Multiverse debating for as long as four years ago, and even debunked the same exact arguments that Lmaolmao used against me already four years ago (like uncountable number of universes argument).